Over at the NaNo Editors LiveJournal group one EdMo participant asked how they know whether they have talent, whether they are a "good" writer.
Like a lot of things in the business (or hobby) of writing it's more about you, the writer, than other writers, readers, editors, agents, award or competition judges.
I don't remember being particularly concerned about whether I was a good writer, whether I had talent or whether others thought so. I have always had a lot of support for my writing, from my English teachers at school to my parents and friends. I may have considered the question more if I hadn't had that support but I still had an almost unwavering belief that this is what I'm meant to do. After working for the past five years on five novels, a handful of short stories and absorbing everything about writing that I could that almost has been blown right out of the water. It's still hard sometimes but I know that I'm supposed to write.
Here was my response to the LJ question:
What defines a good writer? And who measures your writing against that defintion? The answer to both of those questions should be YOU.
If you know WHY you write then you can form a view of what being a successful writer is to you. This may be publication, it may not. Then you can strive to continually IMPROVE your writing to reach success as you have defined it.
2 comments:
I like your answer here. You'll get nothing but heartache if you try to compare yourself to other successful writers.
There must be something in the water, I just wrote a post about talent myself, lol.
Good point. The only person who can truly answer that is you. Everyone else's thoughts on your writing will be subjective and based on their own prejudices.
Joan De La Haye
http://joandelahaye.wordpress.com/
Post a Comment